probability: was was used

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.64
, number
Weight: 0.64
, attribute
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings binomial
Weight: 0.44
, ordinal number
Weight: 0.35
, risk
Weight: 0.35
, irrational number
Weight: 0.34
, rational number
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was was used 1.00
was was used in past 0.90
be used 0.81
was invented 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, be used)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(probability, was was used)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(probability, was was used)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(factor, be used)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(probability, was was used)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(factor, be used)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(probability, was was used)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(rational number, be used)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(factor, be used)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(probability, was was used)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(probability, was was used)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(probability, was was used)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(rational number, be used)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(rational number, be used)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(probability, was was used)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(probability, was was used)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(probability, was was used)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(probability, was was used in past)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(probability, was was used)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(probability, be used)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(probability, was was used)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(probability, be used)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(probability, was was used)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(probability, be used)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(probability, was was used)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(probability, was invented)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(probability, was was used)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(probability, be used)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(probability, was was used)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(probability, was was used in past)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(probability, was was used)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(probability, was was used in past)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(probability, was was used)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(probability, was invented)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(probability, was was used)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(probability, was was used in past)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(probability, was was used)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(probability, was invented)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(probability, was was used)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(probability, was invented)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(probability, was was used)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(probability, was was used)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(probability, was was used)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(probability, was was used)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(probability, was was used)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(probability, was was used)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, be used)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(probability, was was used)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(rational number, be used)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(probability, was was used)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(factor, be used)