problem: answer key

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mental health problem
Weight: 0.77
, issue
Weight: 0.65
, puzzle
Weight: 0.65
, complaint
Weight: 0.63
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.80
, toothache
Weight: 0.68
, inequality
Weight: 0.68
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.68
, limitation
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
answer key 1.00
be important to gilgamesh 0.75
be important to organisation 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(problem, answer key)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(problem, answer key)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(problem, answer key)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(complaint, be important to organisation)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(problem, answer key)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(problem, answer key)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(problem, answer key)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be important to organisation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(problem, answer key)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(problem, answer key)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(problem, answer key)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(problem, answer key)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(problem, answer key)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(problem, answer key)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(problem, answer key)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(problem, answer key)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(problem, answer key)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(problem, answer key)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(problem, answer key)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(problem, answer key)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(complaint, be important to organisation)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(problem, answer key)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(problem, answer key)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(complaint, be important to organisation)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(problem, answer key)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)