problem: be in world

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mental health problem
Weight: 0.77
, issue
Weight: 0.65
, puzzle
Weight: 0.65
, complaint
Weight: 0.63
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.80
, toothache
Weight: 0.68
, inequality
Weight: 0.68
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.68
, limitation
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in world 1.00
has state world 0.91
exist in world 0.85
is global 0.79
be in story day in country 0.75
be with other countries 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(puzzle, has state world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(problem, be in world)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(problem, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(puzzle, has state world)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(problem, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(puzzle, has state world)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(problem, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in world)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(problem, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(inequality, exist in world)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(puzzle, has state world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(problem, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(problem, be in world)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(problem, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(inequality, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(inequality, be in world)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(problem, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(inequality, exist in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(inequality, exist in world)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(problem, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(problem, be in world)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(problem, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(problem, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(problem, be in world)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(problem, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(problem, be in world)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(problem, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(puzzle, has state world)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(problem, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(inequality, be in world)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(problem, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(inequality, exist in world)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(problem, be in world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(puzzle, has state world)