problem: be with gender identity issues

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mental health problem
Weight: 0.77
, issue
Weight: 0.65
, puzzle
Weight: 0.65
, complaint
Weight: 0.63
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.80
, toothache
Weight: 0.68
, inequality
Weight: 0.68
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.68
, limitation
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with gender identity issues 1.00
be in gender 0.88
regard cross cultural issues resolved in workplace 0.81
regard cross cultural issues 0.80
regard cross cultural issues resolved 0.79
regard cross issues resolved in workplace 0.77
regard cross issues 0.75
be with female nature 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(problem, be with gender identity issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be in gender)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(problem, be with gender identity issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(inequality, be in gender) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(inequality, be in gender)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(problem, be with gender identity issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(problem, be with gender identity issues)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(problem, be with gender identity issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(problem, regard cross cultural issues resolved in workplace)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(problem, be with gender identity issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(problem, regard cross cultural issues resolved in workplace)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(problem, be with gender identity issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(problem, regard cross cultural issues resolved in workplace)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(problem, be with gender identity issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(problem, regard cross cultural issues resolved in workplace)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(problem, be with gender identity issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(problem, be with gender identity issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(problem, be with gender identity issues)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(problem, be with gender identity issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(problem, be with gender identity issues)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(problem, be with gender identity issues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(inequality, be in gender)