problem: related to allocation resources economy

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mental health problem
Weight: 0.77
, issue
Weight: 0.65
, puzzle
Weight: 0.65
, complaint
Weight: 0.63
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.80
, toothache
Weight: 0.68
, inequality
Weight: 0.68
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.68
, limitation
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
related to allocation resources economy 1.00
related to allocation of resources in economy 1.00
related to allocation economy 0.97
related to allocation in economy 0.96
related to allocation resources 0.96
related to allocation of resources 0.96
related to allocation 0.91
be associated with use of resources 0.80
affect economic growth 0.78
be bad for economic growth 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(problem, related to allocation resources economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(problem, related to allocation resources economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(problem, related to allocation resources economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(inequality, affect economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(problem, related to allocation resources economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for economic growth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for economic growth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(problem, related to allocation resources economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(problem, related to allocation resources economy)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(problem, related to allocation resources economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(problem, related to allocation of resources in economy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(problem, related to allocation resources economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(problem, related to allocation of resources in economy)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(problem, related to allocation resources economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(problem, related to allocation of resources in economy)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(problem, related to allocation resources economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(problem, related to allocation of resources in economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(problem, related to allocation resources economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(problem, related to allocation resources economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(problem, related to allocation resources economy)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(problem, related to allocation resources economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(problem, related to allocation resources economy)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(problem, related to allocation resources economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inequality, affect economic growth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(problem, related to allocation resources economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for economic growth)