problem: then in past

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mental health problem
Weight: 0.77
, issue
Weight: 0.65
, puzzle
Weight: 0.65
, complaint
Weight: 0.63
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.80
, toothache
Weight: 0.68
, inequality
Weight: 0.68
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.68
, limitation
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
then in past 1.00
be over suddenly all place 0.81
be over suddenly place 0.80
come all at once 0.79
be over all place 0.78
get later worse 0.76
be over place 0.76
be on spotify twice 0.76
be with last shadow 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(issue, be over suddenly all place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(problem, then in past)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(issue, be with last shadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(problem, then in past)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(issue, be over suddenly place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(problem, then in past)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(issue, be on spotify twice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(problem, then in past)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(issue, be over all place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(problem, then in past)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(issue, be over place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(problem, then in past)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(issue, be over place)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(issue, be over all place)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(issue, be over suddenly place)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(issue, be over suddenly all place)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(issue, be on spotify twice)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(issue, be with last shadow)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(issue, be on spotify twice)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(issue, be over suddenly place)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(issue, be with last shadow)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(issue, be over suddenly all place)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(issue, be over all place)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(issue, be over place)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(toothache, get later worse)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(issue, be over suddenly all place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(problem, then in past)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(issue, be over suddenly place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(problem, then in past)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(issue, be over all place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(problem, then in past)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(issue, be on spotify twice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(problem, then in past)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(issue, be with last shadow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(problem, then in past)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(issue, be over place) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(problem, then in past)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(toothache, get later worse) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(toothache, get later worse)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(problem, then in past)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(problem, come all at once)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(problem, come all at once)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(problem, come all at once)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(problem, come all at once)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(problem, then in past)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(problem, then in past)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(issue, be over place)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(issue, be over all place)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(issue, be over suddenly place)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(issue, be over suddenly all place)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(issue, be on spotify twice)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(issue, be with last shadow)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(toothache, get later worse)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(issue, be over place)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(issue, be over all place)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(issue, be over suddenly place)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(issue, be over suddenly all place)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(issue, be on spotify twice)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(problem, then in past) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(issue, be with last shadow)