problem: working for small companies

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mental health problem
Weight: 0.77
, issue
Weight: 0.65
, puzzle
Weight: 0.65
, complaint
Weight: 0.63
Siblings thyroid problem
Weight: 0.80
, toothache
Weight: 0.68
, inequality
Weight: 0.68
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.68
, limitation
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
working for small companies 1.00
working for companies 0.96
be for businesses 0.83
be good for business 0.78
be important in business 0.78
be important to business 0.77
be bad for business 0.77
affect market for music industries 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(issue, affect market for music industries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(problem, working for small companies)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(issue, be for businesses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(problem, working for small companies)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(problem, working for small companies)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(complaint, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(problem, working for small companies)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(problem, working for small companies)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(problem, working for small companies)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(complaint, be good for business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(complaint, be good for business)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(issue, be for businesses)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(complaint, be important to business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(issue, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(issue, affect market for music industries)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be good for business)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be good for business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(issue, affect market for music industries)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(issue, be for businesses)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important in business)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be important to business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(issue, be for businesses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(problem, working for small companies)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(issue, affect market for music industries) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(problem, working for small companies)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(problem, working for small companies)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(complaint, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(problem, working for small companies)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(problem, working for small companies)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(complaint, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(problem, working for small companies)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(inequality, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(inequality, be bad for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(problem, working for small companies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(problem, working for small companies)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(problem, working for small companies)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(complaint, be good for business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(complaint, be good for business)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(issue, be for businesses)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(complaint, be important to business)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(issue, affect market for music industries)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(inequality, be bad for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(issue, be for businesses)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(complaint, be good for business)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(complaint, be good for business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(complaint, be important to business)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(problem, working for small companies) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(issue, affect market for music industries)