process: be managed in windows xp

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mechanism
Weight: 0.66
, approach
Weight: 0.66
, step
Weight: 0.63
, method
Weight: 0.62
Siblings fermentation
Weight: 0.68
, digestion
Weight: 0.67
, chemical reaction
Weight: 0.66
, extraction
Weight: 0.66
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be managed in windows xp 1.00
using cpu 0.78
be in uk 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(process, be managed in windows xp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(process, be managed in windows xp)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(process, be managed in windows xp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(process, using cpu)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(process, be managed in windows xp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(process, using cpu)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(process, be managed in windows xp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(process, be in uk)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(process, be managed in windows xp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(process, using cpu)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(process, be managed in windows xp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(process, be in uk)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(process, be managed in windows xp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(process, be in uk)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(process, be managed in windows xp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(process, be in uk)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(process, be managed in windows xp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(process, using cpu)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(process, be managed in windows xp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(process, be managed in windows xp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(process, be managed in windows xp)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(process, be managed in windows xp) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(process, be managed in windows xp)