process: be more important than product

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mechanism
Weight: 0.66
, approach
Weight: 0.66
, step
Weight: 0.63
, method
Weight: 0.62
Siblings fermentation
Weight: 0.68
, digestion
Weight: 0.67
, chemical reaction
Weight: 0.66
, extraction
Weight: 0.66
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more important than product 1.00
be more important than outcome 0.77
be important in business 0.76
be important in marketing 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(process, be more important than product)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(process, be important in business)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(process, be important in marketing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(process, be more important than outcome)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(process, be more important than outcome)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(process, be important in business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(process, be important in marketing)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(process, be more important than outcome)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(process, be more important than outcome)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(process, be important in marketing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(process, be important in business)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(process, be important in marketing)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(process, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(process, be more important than product)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(process, be more important than product)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(process, be more important than product)