process: be unique to individual

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mechanism
Weight: 0.66
, approach
Weight: 0.66
, step
Weight: 0.63
, method
Weight: 0.62
Siblings fermentation
Weight: 0.68
, digestion
Weight: 0.67
, chemical reaction
Weight: 0.66
, extraction
Weight: 0.66
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be unique to individual 1.00
be different 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(process, be unique to individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fermentation, be different)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(process, be unique to individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(photosynthesis, be different)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(process, be unique to individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(photosynthesis, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(photosynthesis, be different)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(process, be unique to individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(fermentation, be different) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(fermentation, be different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(process, be unique to individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(process, be unique to individual)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(process, be unique to individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(process, be different)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(process, be unique to individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(process, be different)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(process, be unique to individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(process, be different)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(process, be unique to individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(process, be different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(process, be unique to individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(process, be unique to individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(process, be unique to individual)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(process, be unique to individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(process, be unique to individual)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(process, be unique to individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(fermentation, be different)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(process, be unique to individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(photosynthesis, be different)