processor: has physical part pins

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents central processing unit
Weight: 0.72
, chip
Weight: 0.67
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.66
, unit
Weight: 0.66
Siblings cache
Weight: 0.62
, controller
Weight: 0.60
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.37
, motherboard
Weight: 0.36
, potato chip
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part pins 1.00
have many pins 0.92
have easily bent pins 0.86
have many easily bent pins 0.86
has physical part buttons 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(processor, has physical part pins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(controller, has physical part buttons)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(processor, has physical part pins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(controller, has physical part buttons) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(controller, has physical part buttons)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(processor, has physical part pins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(processor, has physical part pins)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(processor, has physical part pins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(processor, have many pins)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(processor, has physical part pins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(processor, have many pins)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(processor, has physical part pins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(processor, have many pins)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(processor, has physical part pins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(processor, have easily bent pins)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(processor, has physical part pins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(processor, have many easily bent pins)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(processor, has physical part pins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(processor, have easily bent pins)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(processor, has physical part pins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(processor, have many easily bent pins)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(processor, has physical part pins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(processor, have easily bent pins)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(processor, has physical part pins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(processor, have many easily bent pins)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(processor, has physical part pins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(processor, have many pins)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(processor, has physical part pins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(processor, have easily bent pins)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(processor, has physical part pins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(processor, have many easily bent pins)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(processor, has physical part pins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(processor, has physical part pins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(processor, has physical part pins)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(processor, has physical part pins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(processor, has physical part pins)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(processor, has physical part pins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(controller, has physical part buttons)