processor: have supported ram clock speed s

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents central processing unit
Weight: 0.72
, chip
Weight: 0.67
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.66
, unit
Weight: 0.66
Siblings cache
Weight: 0.62
, controller
Weight: 0.60
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.37
, motherboard
Weight: 0.36
, potato chip
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have supported ram clock speed s 1.00
be faster than ram 0.83
be better than ram 0.81
have max ram limit 0.80
have ram limits 0.78
be more expensive than ram 0.78
be smaller than ram 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(processor, have supported ram clock speed s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, have max ram limit)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(processor, have supported ram clock speed s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cache, be better than ram)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(processor, have supported ram clock speed s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(cache, be faster than ram)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(processor, have supported ram clock speed s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, have ram limits)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(processor, have supported ram clock speed s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(cache, be more expensive than ram)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(processor, have supported ram clock speed s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(cache, be smaller than ram)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(processor, have supported ram clock speed s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(motherboard, have ram limits) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(motherboard, have ram limits)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(processor, have supported ram clock speed s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cache, be better than ram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(cache, be better than ram)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(processor, have supported ram clock speed s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(motherboard, have max ram limit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(motherboard, have max ram limit)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(processor, have supported ram clock speed s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(cache, be faster than ram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(cache, be faster than ram)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(processor, have supported ram clock speed s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(cache, be smaller than ram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(cache, be smaller than ram)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(processor, have supported ram clock speed s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(cache, be more expensive than ram)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(processor, have supported ram clock speed s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(processor, have supported ram clock speed s)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(processor, have supported ram clock speed s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(processor, have supported ram clock speed s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(processor, have supported ram clock speed s)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(processor, have supported ram clock speed s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(processor, have supported ram clock speed s)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(processor, have supported ram clock speed s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cache, be better than ram)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(processor, have supported ram clock speed s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(motherboard, have ram limits)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(processor, have supported ram clock speed s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(motherboard, have max ram limit)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(processor, have supported ram clock speed s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(cache, be faster than ram)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(processor, have supported ram clock speed s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cache, be more expensive than ram)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(processor, have supported ram clock speed s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cache, be smaller than ram)