processor: heat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents central processing unit
Weight: 0.72
, chip
Weight: 0.67
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.66
, unit
Weight: 0.66
Siblings cache
Weight: 0.62
, controller
Weight: 0.60
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.37
, motherboard
Weight: 0.36
, potato chip
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
heat 1.00
generate heat 0.86
produce waste heat 0.84
generate heat under load 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(processor, heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(microprocessor, generate heat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(processor, heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(microprocessor, generate heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(microprocessor, generate heat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(processor, heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(processor, heat)

Similarity expansion

0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(processor, heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(processor, generate heat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(processor, heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(processor, generate heat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(processor, heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(processor, generate heat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(processor, heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(processor, generate heat under load)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(processor, heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(processor, generate heat under load)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(processor, heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(processor, generate heat under load)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(processor, heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(processor, generate heat)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(processor, heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(processor, generate heat under load)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(processor, heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(processor, heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(processor, heat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(processor, heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(processor, heat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(processor, heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(microprocessor, generate heat)