processor: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents central processing unit
Weight: 0.72
, chip
Weight: 0.67
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.66
, unit
Weight: 0.66
Siblings cache
Weight: 0.62
, controller
Weight: 0.60
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.37
, motherboard
Weight: 0.36
, potato chip
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is pricey 0.89
is costly 0.87
be cheaper 0.84
is damn expensive 0.84
is cheap 0.79
be more expensive than ram 0.79
is complicated 0.78
be used in process costing 0.77
be cheaper exactly 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(unit, be used in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(processor, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(unit, be used in process costing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(unit, be used in process costing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(controller, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(potato chip, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(cache, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(controller, is pricey)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(cache, be more expensive than ram)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, is cheap)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(controller, is damn expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, is complicated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(unit, be used in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(processor, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(cache, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cache, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(motherboard, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(motherboard, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(controller, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(controller, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(potato chip, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(potato chip, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(controller, is pricey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(controller, is pricey)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(controller, is damn expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(controller, is damn expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(motherboard, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(motherboard, is complicated)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(cache, be more expensive than ram) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(cache, be more expensive than ram)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(motherboard, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(motherboard, is cheap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(processor, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(processor, is costly)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(processor, is costly)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(processor, is costly)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(processor, is costly)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(processor, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(processor, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(unit, be used in process costing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(motherboard, is complicated)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(controller, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cache, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(motherboard, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(potato chip, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cache, be more expensive than ram)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(controller, is pricey)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(motherboard, is cheap)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(controller, is damn expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(processor, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(unit, be used in process costing)