processor: slow down over time

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents central processing unit
Weight: 0.72
, chip
Weight: 0.67
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.66
, unit
Weight: 0.66
Siblings cache
Weight: 0.62
, controller
Weight: 0.60
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.37
, motherboard
Weight: 0.36
, potato chip
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
slow down over time 1.00
get over time 0.85
run slow 0.83
take long time 0.76
has pace rate 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(unit, has pace rate)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(processor, slow down over time)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(computer hardware, get over time)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(processor, slow down over time)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(processor, slow down over time)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(computer hardware, get over time)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(processor, slow down over time)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(unit, has pace rate)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(processor, slow down over time)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(unit, has pace rate)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(processor, slow down over time)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(computer hardware, get over time)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(processor, slow down over time)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cache, take long time)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(computer hardware, get over time)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(processor, slow down over time)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(processor, slow down over time)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(unit, has pace rate)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(processor, slow down over time)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(processor, slow down over time)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(processor, slow down over time)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cache, take long time)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cache, take long time)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(processor, slow down over time)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(processor, slow down over time)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(processor, slow down over time)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(processor, run slow)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(processor, slow down over time)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(processor, run slow)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(processor, slow down over time)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(processor, run slow)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(processor, slow down over time)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(processor, run slow)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(processor, slow down over time)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(processor, slow down over time)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(processor, slow down over time)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(processor, slow down over time)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(processor, slow down over time)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(processor, slow down over time)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer hardware, get over time)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(processor, slow down over time)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(unit, has pace rate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(processor, slow down over time)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(cache, take long time)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(processor, slow down over time)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(computer hardware, get over time)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(processor, slow down over time)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(unit, has pace rate)