procreate: be motivated by condom broke

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents nothing
Weight: 0.25
Siblings perfection
Weight: 0.21
, read book
Weight: 0.19
, reproduce
Weight: 0.19
, pant
Weight: 0.17
, entertain
Weight: 0.17

Related properties

Property Similarity
be motivated by condom broke 1.00
requires not use condom 0.90
requires stop use condom 0.89
requires take off condom 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(procreate, be motivated by condom broke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(reproduce, requires take off condom)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(procreate, be motivated by condom broke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(reproduce, requires take off condom) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(reproduce, requires take off condom)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(procreate, be motivated by condom broke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(procreate, be motivated by condom broke)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(procreate, be motivated by condom broke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(procreate, requires not use condom)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(procreate, be motivated by condom broke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(procreate, requires stop use condom)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(procreate, be motivated by condom broke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(procreate, requires not use condom)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(procreate, be motivated by condom broke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(procreate, requires not use condom)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(procreate, be motivated by condom broke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(procreate, requires not use condom)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(procreate, be motivated by condom broke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(procreate, requires stop use condom)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(procreate, be motivated by condom broke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(procreate, requires stop use condom)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(procreate, be motivated by condom broke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(procreate, requires stop use condom)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(procreate, be motivated by condom broke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(procreate, be motivated by condom broke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(procreate, be motivated by condom broke)

Typical implies Plausible

0.05
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(procreate, be motivated by condom broke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(procreate, be motivated by condom broke)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(procreate, be motivated by condom broke) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(reproduce, requires take off condom)