produce: is more expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fresh food
Weight: 0.60
, department
Weight: 0.54
, cause
Weight: 0.54
, ingredient
Weight: 0.52
Siblings raw material
Weight: 0.66
, berry
Weight: 0.60
, paddy
Weight: 0.41
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.33
, fruit
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more expensive 1.00
be more expensive than non-local 0.98
is expensive 0.94
is really expensive 0.87
is cheaper 0.86
be more expensive than vegetables 0.84
be much more expensive than junk food 0.84
be expensive in hawaii 0.79
is inexpensive 0.78
is less durable 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fresh food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(produce, is more expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(produce, is more expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fresh food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(produce, is more expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fresh food, is more expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fresh food, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(fresh food, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is more expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(fresh food, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(berry, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(fresh fruit, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(fresh food, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(produce, is more expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(fresh food, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(produce, is more expensive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(fresh food, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(produce, is more expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(fresh fruit, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fresh fruit, is expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(berry, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(berry, is expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(produce, is more expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(produce, be more expensive than non-local)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(produce, be more expensive than non-local)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(produce, be more expensive than non-local)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(produce, be more expensive than non-local)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(produce, is expensive)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(produce, is expensive)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(produce, is expensive)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(produce, be much more expensive than junk food)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(produce, be much more expensive than junk food)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(produce, be much more expensive than junk food)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(produce, be much more expensive than junk food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(produce, be expensive in hawaii)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(produce, be expensive in hawaii)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(produce, is less durable)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(produce, is less durable)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(produce, is less durable)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(produce, be expensive in hawaii)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(produce, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(produce, be expensive in hawaii)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(produce, is less durable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(produce, is more expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(produce, is more expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fresh food, is more expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fresh food, is cheaper)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fresh food, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(fruit, be more expensive than vegetables)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(berry, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(fresh fruit, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fresh food, is more expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fresh food, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(produce, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(fresh food, is cheaper)