producer: be important in community

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.65
, director
Weight: 0.63
, artist
Weight: 0.62
, farmer
Weight: 0.61
, seller
Weight: 0.60
Siblings creator
Weight: 0.63
, babyface
Weight: 0.53
, cool
Weight: 0.50
, brewer
Weight: 0.50
, film maker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in community 1.00
be important to community 1.00
be important to business 0.79
be important to environment 0.78
be important in ecosystem 0.76
be in ecosystem important 0.76
be important in music 0.75
be important to ecosystem 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(producer, be important in community)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(producer, be important to community)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(producer, be important to community)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(producer, be important to community)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(producer, be important to community)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(producer, be important to business)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(producer, be important to environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(producer, be important to environment)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(producer, be in ecosystem important)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(producer, be in ecosystem important)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(producer, be important to business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(producer, be important in ecosystem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(producer, be important to environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(producer, be important in ecosystem)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(producer, be important to business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(producer, be in ecosystem important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(producer, be important to ecosystem)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(producer, be important in music)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(producer, be important to ecosystem)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(producer, be important in ecosystem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(producer, be important to ecosystem)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(producer, be important in music)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(producer, be important in music)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(producer, be important to business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(producer, be important in music)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(producer, be important to environment)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(producer, be important in ecosystem)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(producer, be in ecosystem important)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(producer, be important to ecosystem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(producer, be important in community)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(producer, be important in community)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(producer, be important in community)