product: be important in marketing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.85
, niche
Weight: 0.62
, search engine
Weight: 0.62
, marketplace
Weight: 0.61
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.70
, soy sauce
Weight: 0.68
, potato chip
Weight: 0.68
, mouthwash
Weight: 0.67
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in marketing 1.00
be important in marketing mix 0.91
be important to marketing mix 0.91
be most important element of marketing mix 0.84
be important in business 0.80
be important for business 0.80
be important to business 0.80
seem work best with advertising campaigns 0.78
seem work with advertising campaigns 0.78
seem work best with rational advertising campaigns 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(niche, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(product, be important in marketing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(niche, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(niche, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(niche, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(product, be important in marketing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(product, be important in marketing)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(product, be important in marketing mix)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(product, be important to marketing mix)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(product, be most important element of marketing mix)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(product, be important in marketing mix)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(product, be important to marketing mix)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(product, be important in marketing mix)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(product, be important to marketing mix)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(product, be important to marketing mix)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(product, be important in marketing mix)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(product, be important to business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(product, be important for business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(product, seem work best with rational advertising campaigns)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(product, be most important element of marketing mix)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(product, be most important element of marketing mix)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(product, be important to business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(product, be most important element of marketing mix)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(product, be important to business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(product, be important for business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(product, seem work best with rational advertising campaigns)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(product, be important for business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(product, be important for business)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(product, be important to business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(product, seem work best with rational advertising campaigns)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(product, seem work best with rational advertising campaigns)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(product, be important in marketing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(product, be important in marketing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(niche, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(product, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(niche, be important in business)