product: fail in market

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.85
, niche
Weight: 0.62
, search engine
Weight: 0.62
, marketplace
Weight: 0.61
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.70
, soy sauce
Weight: 0.68
, potato chip
Weight: 0.68
, mouthwash
Weight: 0.67
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
fail in market 1.00
fail 0.87
is market 0.86
fail in countries 0.82
enter market 0.81
fail in other countries 0.80
is markets 0.78
is near markets 0.77
fails 0.76
be with demand priced higher 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(product, fail in market)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(product, fail in market)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(product, fail in market)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(product, fail)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(product, fail in market)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(product, fail)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(product, fail in market)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(product, fail)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(product, fail in market)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(product, fail)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(product, fail in market)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(product, fail in other countries)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(product, fail in market)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(product, fail in other countries)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(product, fail in market)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(product, fail in other countries)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(product, fail in market)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(product, fail in other countries)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(product, fail in market)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(product, enter market)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(product, fail in market)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(product, enter market)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(product, fail in market)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(product, enter market)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(product, fail in market)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(product, enter market)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(product, fail in market)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(product, fail in market)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(product, fail in market)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(product, fail in market)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(product, fail in market)