product: is is burned

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.85
, niche
Weight: 0.62
, search engine
Weight: 0.62
, marketplace
Weight: 0.61
Siblings carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.70
, soy sauce
Weight: 0.68
, potato chip
Weight: 0.68
, mouthwash
Weight: 0.67
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
is is burned 1.00
burn 0.83
burn bad 0.81
burn really bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(product, is is burned)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, burn bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(product, is is burned)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, burn)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(product, is is burned)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(mouthwash, burn really bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(product, is is burned)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(mouthwash, burn)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(mouthwash, burn)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(product, is is burned)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(mouthwash, burn bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(mouthwash, burn bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(product, is is burned)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(mouthwash, burn really bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mouthwash, burn really bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(product, is is burned)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(product, is is burned)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(product, is is burned)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(product, is is burned)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(product, is is burned)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(product, is is burned)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(product, is is burned)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(product, is is burned)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(mouthwash, burn)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(product, is is burned)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(mouthwash, burn bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(product, is is burned)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(mouthwash, burn really bad)