production: be cheaper in china

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adaptation
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, sector
Weight: 0.59
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.58
Siblings consumption
Weight: 0.58
, manufacturing
Weight: 0.34
, oil company
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.32
, film
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper in china 1.00
be cheap in china 0.93
be in china 0.89
is china 0.88
is cheaper 0.87
be cheaper in mexico 0.81
is expensive 0.79
is more expensive 0.79
is cheap 0.78
look cheap 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, be in china)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, be cheap in china)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, is china)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, is cheaper)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, is cheap)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(film, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(manufacturing, be in china)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(manufacturing, be in china)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(manufacturing, is china)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(manufacturing, is china)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(manufacturing, be cheap in china)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(manufacturing, be cheap in china)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(manufacturing, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(manufacturing, is cheaper)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(film, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(film, is expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(manufacturing, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(manufacturing, is cheap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(production, be cheaper in china)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in mexico)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(production, be cheaper in mexico)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(production, be cheaper in mexico)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(production, be cheaper in mexico)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in china)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(production, be cheaper in china)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(manufacturing, be in china)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(manufacturing, is china)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(manufacturing, be cheap in china)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(manufacturing, is cheaper)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(manufacturing, is cheap)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in china)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(film, is expensive)