production: be cheaper in mexico

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adaptation
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, sector
Weight: 0.59
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.58
Siblings consumption
Weight: 0.58
, manufacturing
Weight: 0.34
, oil company
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.32
, film
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper in mexico 1.00
is cheaper 0.83
be cheaper in china 0.81
play role in mexico city 0.80
be in india 0.77
is cheap 0.76
look cheap 0.76
be cheap in china 0.75
become in india 0.75
be popular in africa 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sector, be popular in africa)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(production, be cheaper in mexico)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(sector, become in india)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(production, be cheaper in mexico)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(sector, become in india)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(sector, be popular in africa)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sector, become in india)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sector, be popular in africa)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, play role in mexico city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, is cheaper)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, be cheap in china)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, is cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(sector, be popular in africa)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(production, be cheaper in mexico)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(sector, become in india)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(production, be cheaper in mexico)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(manufacturing, play role in mexico city)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(manufacturing, play role in mexico city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(manufacturing, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(manufacturing, is cheaper)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(manufacturing, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(manufacturing, is cheap)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(manufacturing, be cheap in china)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(manufacturing, be cheap in china)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(production, be cheaper in mexico)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(production, be cheaper in china)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(production, be cheaper in china)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(production, be cheaper in china)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in china)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in mexico)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(production, be cheaper in mexico)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(sector, become in india)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sector, be popular in africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(manufacturing, play role in mexico city)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(manufacturing, be cheap in china)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(manufacturing, is cheaper)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(manufacturing, is cheap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(sector, become in india)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(production, be cheaper in mexico)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sector, be popular in africa)