production: be important in business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adaptation
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, sector
Weight: 0.59
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.58
Siblings consumption
Weight: 0.58
, manufacturing
Weight: 0.34
, oil company
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.32
, film
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in business 1.00
be important to business 0.99
be important to ecomorphs 0.82
be very profitable for companies 0.82
be important for economy 0.81
be important in economy 0.81
be important to economy 0.80
be important for people 0.79
is more important 0.79
be very profitable for pharmaceutical companies 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aspect, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(production, be important in business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(adaptation, be important to ecomorphs)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(production, be important in business)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(production, be important in business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(sector, be important to economy)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(production, be important in business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(aspect, be important to business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(sector, be important to economy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(adaptation, be important to ecomorphs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(sector, is more important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(aspect, be important to business)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(adaptation, be important to ecomorphs)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(sector, be important to economy)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sector, is more important)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, be very profitable for pharmaceutical companies)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(manufacturing, be very profitable for companies)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(consumption, be important for people)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(aspect, be important to business)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(production, be important in business)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(adaptation, be important to ecomorphs)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(production, be important in business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(sector, be important to economy)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(production, be important in business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(sector, is more important)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(production, be important in business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(consumption, be important for people)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(consumption, be important for people)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(manufacturing, be very profitable for companies)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(manufacturing, be very profitable for companies)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(manufacturing, be very profitable for pharmaceutical companies)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(manufacturing, be very profitable for pharmaceutical companies)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(production, be important in business)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(production, be important for economy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(production, be important in economy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(production, be important in economy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(production, be important to economy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(production, be important for economy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(production, be important to economy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(production, be important in economy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(production, be important to economy)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(production, be important for economy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(production, be important in economy)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(production, be important to economy)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(production, be important for economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(production, be important in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(production, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sector, be important to economy)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(aspect, be important to business)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sector, is more important)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(adaptation, be important to ecomorphs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(consumption, be important for people)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(manufacturing, be very profitable for companies)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(manufacturing, be very profitable for pharmaceutical companies)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(aspect, be important to business)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(sector, be important to economy)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sector, is more important)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(production, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(adaptation, be important to ecomorphs)