production: be key measurement to ecologists

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adaptation
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, sector
Weight: 0.59
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.58
Siblings consumption
Weight: 0.58
, manufacturing
Weight: 0.34
, oil company
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.32
, film
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be key measurement to ecologists 1.00
be necessary for qualitative researchers 0.79
be necessary for researchers 0.78
be important in scientific experiment 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(variable, be important in scientific experiment)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(production, be key measurement to ecologists)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(aspect, be necessary for researchers)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(production, be key measurement to ecologists)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(aspect, be necessary for qualitative researchers)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(production, be key measurement to ecologists)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(production, be key measurement to ecologists)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(aspect, be necessary for qualitative researchers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(production, be key measurement to ecologists)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(aspect, be necessary for researchers)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(production, be key measurement to ecologists)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(variable, be important in scientific experiment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(production, be key measurement to ecologists)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(aspect, be necessary for qualitative researchers)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(production, be key measurement to ecologists)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aspect, be necessary for researchers)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(production, be key measurement to ecologists)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(variable, be important in scientific experiment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(variable, be important in scientific experiment)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(production, be key measurement to ecologists)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(production, be key measurement to ecologists)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(aspect, be necessary for researchers)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(production, be key measurement to ecologists)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(production, be key measurement to ecologists)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(aspect, be necessary for qualitative researchers)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(production, be key measurement to ecologists)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(production, be key measurement to ecologists)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(production, be key measurement to ecologists)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(production, be key measurement to ecologists)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(production, be key measurement to ecologists)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(production, be key measurement to ecologists)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(production, be key measurement to ecologists)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(production, be key measurement to ecologists)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(production, be key measurement to ecologists)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(production, be key measurement to ecologists)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(aspect, be necessary for qualitative researchers)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(production, be key measurement to ecologists)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(aspect, be necessary for researchers)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(production, be key measurement to ecologists)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(variable, be important in scientific experiment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(production, be key measurement to ecologists)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(aspect, be necessary for qualitative researchers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(production, be key measurement to ecologists)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(aspect, be necessary for researchers)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(production, be key measurement to ecologists)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(variable, be important in scientific experiment)