production: beneficial for survival of future generations of organism

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adaptation
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, sector
Weight: 0.59
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.58
Siblings consumption
Weight: 0.58
, manufacturing
Weight: 0.34
, oil company
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.32
, film
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
beneficial for survival of future generations of organism 1.00
more beneficial for survival of future generations of organism 1.00
beneficial for survival of future generations 0.96
more beneficial for survival of future generations 0.96
be important for organism survival 0.90
more beneficial for survival 0.87
beneficial for survival 0.87
be important for survival of species 0.86
be necessary for species survival 0.85
be important for human survival 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(adaptation, be important for organism survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(adaptation, be important for survival of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(adaptation, be necessary for species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(adaptation, be important for organism survival)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(adaptation, be necessary for species survival)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(adaptation, be important for survival of species)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(adaptation, be important for organism survival)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(adaptation, be necessary for species survival)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(adaptation, be important for survival of species)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(adaptation, be important for organism survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(adaptation, be important for survival of species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(adaptation, be necessary for species survival) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(production, more beneficial for survival of future generations of organism)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(production, more beneficial for survival of future generations of organism)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(production, more beneficial for survival of future generations)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(production, beneficial for survival of future generations)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(production, more beneficial for survival of future generations of organism)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(production, more beneficial for survival of future generations of organism)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(production, beneficial for survival of future generations)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(production, more beneficial for survival of future generations)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(production, more beneficial for survival of future generations)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(production, beneficial for survival of future generations)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(production, beneficial for survival)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(production, more beneficial for survival)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(production, beneficial for survival)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(production, beneficial for survival)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(production, more beneficial for survival)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(production, more beneficial for survival)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(production, beneficial for survival of future generations)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(production, more beneficial for survival of future generations)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(production, beneficial for survival)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(production, more beneficial for survival)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(adaptation, be important for organism survival)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(adaptation, be necessary for species survival)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(adaptation, be important for survival of species)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(adaptation, be important for organism survival)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(adaptation, be necessary for species survival)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(production, beneficial for survival of future generations of organism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(adaptation, be important for survival of species)