production: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents adaptation
Weight: 0.62
, business activity
Weight: 0.60
, sector
Weight: 0.59
, aspect
Weight: 0.58
, variable
Weight: 0.58
Siblings consumption
Weight: 0.58
, manufacturing
Weight: 0.34
, oil company
Weight: 0.33
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.32
, film
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
solve problem 0.84
solve problem of demand 0.83
solve problem of demand of diesel 0.79
were dealing with problems 0.78
were dealing with social problems 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(variable, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(production, has state problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(production, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(variable, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(production, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(variable, has state problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(production, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(consumption, has state problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(production, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(oil company, solve problem)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(production, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(oil company, solve problem of demand)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(production, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(oil company, solve problem of demand of diesel)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(variable, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(production, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(production, has state problem)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(production, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(consumption, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(consumption, has state problem)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(production, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(oil company, solve problem)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(oil company, solve problem)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(production, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(oil company, solve problem of demand)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(oil company, solve problem of demand)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(production, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(oil company, solve problem of demand of diesel)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(oil company, solve problem of demand of diesel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(production, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(production, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(production, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(production, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(production, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(production, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(production, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(production, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(variable, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(production, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(consumption, has state problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(production, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(oil company, solve problem)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(production, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(oil company, solve problem of demand)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(production, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(oil company, solve problem of demand of diesel)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(production, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(variable, has state problem)