professional: have special obligations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents graduate student
Weight: 0.61
, customer
Weight: 0.58
, third party
Weight: 0.56
, expert
Weight: 0.55
Siblings staff
Weight: 0.67
, team
Weight: 0.65
, realtor
Weight: 0.64
, entrepreneur
Weight: 0.62
, counselor
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
have special obligations 1.00
have obligations 0.97
have special moral obligations 0.94
have moral obligations 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(professional, have special obligations)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(professional, have special obligations)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(professional, have special obligations)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(professional, have obligations)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(professional, have special obligations)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(professional, have obligations)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(professional, have special obligations)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(professional, have special moral obligations)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(professional, have special obligations)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(professional, have moral obligations)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(professional, have special obligations)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(professional, have moral obligations)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(professional, have special obligations)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(professional, have special moral obligations)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(professional, have special obligations)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(professional, have special moral obligations)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(professional, have special obligations)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(professional, have obligations)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(professional, have special obligations)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(professional, have special moral obligations)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(professional, have special obligations)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(professional, have moral obligations)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(professional, have special obligations)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(professional, have moral obligations)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(professional, have special obligations)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(professional, have obligations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(professional, have special obligations)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(professional, have special obligations)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(professional, have special obligations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(professional, have special obligations)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(professional, have special obligations)