profit: be better than wages

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.60
, motive
Weight: 0.60
, report
Weight: 0.59
, statement
Weight: 0.58
Siblings cent
Weight: 0.60
, speculator
Weight: 0.42
, revenue
Weight: 0.35
, equity
Weight: 0.32
, bank statement
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than wages 1.00
be less than price 0.76
be better than debt 0.75
be less than demand 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(profit, be better than wages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be less than price)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(profit, be better than wages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(revenue, be less than demand)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(profit, be better than wages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(equity, be better than debt)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(profit, be better than wages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(revenue, be less than price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(revenue, be less than price)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(profit, be better than wages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(equity, be better than debt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(equity, be better than debt)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(profit, be better than wages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(revenue, be less than demand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(revenue, be less than demand)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(profit, be better than wages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(profit, be better than wages)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(profit, be better than wages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(profit, be better than wages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(profit, be better than wages)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(profit, be better than wages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(profit, be better than wages)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(profit, be better than wages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(revenue, be less than price)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(profit, be better than wages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(revenue, be less than demand)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(profit, be better than wages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(equity, be better than debt)