profit: be calculated for inventory sales

Related concepts

Parents	value Weight: 0.60 , motive Weight: 0.60 , report Weight: 0.59 , statement Weight: 0.58
Siblings	cent Weight: 0.60 , speculator Weight: 0.42 , revenue Weight: 0.35 , equity Weight: 0.32 , bank statement Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be calculated for inventory sales	1.00
be in inventory	0.92
be based pricing	0.76
be based pricing better	0.76
decrease in value	0.76
be less than gross value	0.75
be reported on income statement under accrual basis of accounting	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(value, be based pricing better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(profit, be calculated for inventory sales)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(value, decrease in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(profit, be calculated for inventory sales)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(profit, be calculated for inventory sales) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(value, decrease in value)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(profit, be calculated for inventory sales) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Plausible(value, be based pricing better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(profit, be calculated for inventory sales) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(value, decrease in value)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(profit, be calculated for inventory sales) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(value, be based pricing better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(profit, be calculated for inventory sales) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(revenue, be reported on income statement under accrual basis of accounting)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

Plausible(value, be based pricing better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(profit, be calculated for inventory sales) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(profit, be calculated for inventory sales)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(value, decrease in value) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(profit, be calculated for inventory sales) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(profit, be calculated for inventory sales)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(profit, be calculated for inventory sales) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(revenue, be reported on income statement under accrual basis of accounting) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Plausible(revenue, be reported on income statement under accrual basis of accounting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(profit, be calculated for inventory sales) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Salient(profit, be calculated for inventory sales)

Similarity expansion

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(profit, be calculated for inventory sales) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(profit, be in inventory)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.54

Salient(profit, be calculated for inventory sales) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(profit, be in inventory)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(profit, be calculated for inventory sales) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(profit, be in inventory)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(profit, be calculated for inventory sales) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(profit, be in inventory)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

Salient(profit, be calculated for inventory sales) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(profit, be calculated for inventory sales) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(profit, be calculated for inventory sales)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.45

Plausible(profit, be calculated for inventory sales) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(profit, be calculated for inventory sales)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(profit, be calculated for inventory sales) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(value, decrease in value)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(profit, be calculated for inventory sales) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(value, be based pricing better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(profit, be calculated for inventory sales) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(revenue, be reported on income statement under accrual basis of accounting)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(profit, be calculated for inventory sales) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(value, decrease in value)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(profit, be calculated for inventory sales) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(value, be based pricing better)