profit: be lower in competitive markets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.60
, motive
Weight: 0.60
, report
Weight: 0.59
, statement
Weight: 0.58
Siblings cent
Weight: 0.60
, speculator
Weight: 0.42
, revenue
Weight: 0.35
, equity
Weight: 0.32
, bank statement
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be lower in competitive markets 1.00
be lower in markets 0.94
be important in market economy 0.80
be important in free market economy 0.80
be based pricing better 0.78
be important to businesses in sector 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(value, be based pricing better)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(profit, be lower in competitive markets)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(profit, be lower in competitive markets)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(value, be based pricing better)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(profit, be lower in competitive markets)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(value, be based pricing better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(value, be based pricing better)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(profit, be lower in competitive markets)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(profit, be lower in competitive markets)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(profit, be lower in competitive markets)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(profit, be lower in competitive markets)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(profit, be lower in competitive markets)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(profit, be important in free market economy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(profit, be lower in competitive markets)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(profit, be important in free market economy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(profit, be lower in competitive markets)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(profit, be important in market economy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(profit, be lower in competitive markets)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(profit, be important in market economy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(profit, be lower in competitive markets)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(profit, be important to businesses in sector)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(profit, be lower in competitive markets)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(profit, be important to businesses in sector)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(profit, be lower in competitive markets)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(profit, be important in free market economy)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(profit, be lower in competitive markets)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(profit, be important in market economy)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(profit, be lower in competitive markets)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(profit, be important to businesses in sector)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(profit, be lower in competitive markets)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(profit, be important in market economy)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(profit, be lower in competitive markets)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(profit, be important to businesses in sector)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(profit, be lower in competitive markets)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(profit, be important in free market economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(profit, be lower in competitive markets)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(profit, be lower in competitive markets)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(profit, be lower in competitive markets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(profit, be lower in competitive markets)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(profit, be lower in competitive markets)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(profit, be lower in competitive markets)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(value, be based pricing better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(profit, be lower in competitive markets)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(value, be based pricing better)