program: requires like to solve problem

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents television program
Weight: 0.73
, computer program
Weight: 0.67
, package
Weight: 0.64
, nation
Weight: 0.62
Siblings camp
Weight: 0.66
, peace corps
Weight: 0.65
, campaign
Weight: 0.65
, kindergarten
Weight: 0.65
, philosophy
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
requires like to solve problem 1.00
be used to solve problem 0.98
be motivated by it solve problem 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(computer program, be used to solve problem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(program, requires like to solve problem)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(program, requires like to solve problem)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(computer program, be used to solve problem)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(program, requires like to solve problem)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(computer program, be used to solve problem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(computer program, be used to solve problem)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(program, requires like to solve problem)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(program, requires like to solve problem)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(program, requires like to solve problem)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(program, requires like to solve problem)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(program, requires like to solve problem)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(program, be motivated by it solve problem)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(program, requires like to solve problem)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(program, be motivated by it solve problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(program, requires like to solve problem)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(program, be motivated by it solve problem)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(program, requires like to solve problem)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(program, be motivated by it solve problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(program, requires like to solve problem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(program, requires like to solve problem)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(program, requires like to solve problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(program, requires like to solve problem)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(program, requires like to solve problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(program, requires like to solve problem)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(computer program, be used to solve problem)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(program, requires like to solve problem)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(computer program, be used to solve problem)