programmer: be vs developer

Property	Similarity
be vs developer	1.00
be vs software developer	0.96
be vs software engineer	0.81
be vs software engineers	0.78
be vs coders	0.76
be paid less than software developers	0.75

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(programmer, be vs developer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(programmer, be vs software developer)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(programmer, be vs developer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(programmer, be vs software developer)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(programmer, be vs developer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(programmer, be vs software engineer)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(programmer, be vs developer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(programmer, be vs software engineers)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(programmer, be vs developer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(programmer, be vs software developer)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(programmer, be vs developer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(programmer, be vs coders)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(programmer, be vs developer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Typical(programmer, be vs software developer)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(programmer, be vs developer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(programmer, be vs software engineer)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(programmer, be vs developer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(programmer, be vs coders)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.79

Salient(programmer, be vs developer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Salient(programmer, be vs software engineers)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(programmer, be vs developer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(programmer, be vs coders)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(programmer, be vs developer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(programmer, be vs software engineer)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(programmer, be vs developer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(programmer, be vs coders)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(programmer, be vs developer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(programmer, be vs software engineer)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(programmer, be vs developer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(programmer, be vs software engineers)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

Typical(programmer, be vs developer) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(programmer, be vs software engineers)

Parents	musician Weight: 0.62 , talent Weight: 0.59 , expert Weight: 0.58 , person Weight: 0.57
Siblings	developer Weight: 0.57 , computer scientist Weight: 0.34 , engineer Weight: 0.34 , scientist Weight: 0.33

programmer: be vs developer

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings