programmer: need glasses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents musician
Weight: 0.62
, talent
Weight: 0.59
, expert
Weight: 0.58
, person
Weight: 0.57
Siblings developer
Weight: 0.57
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.34
, engineer
Weight: 0.34
, scientist
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
need glasses 1.00
use glasses 0.97
wear glasses 0.95
do wear headphones 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(musician, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(programmer, need glasses)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(programmer, need glasses)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(musician, wear glasses)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(programmer, need glasses)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(musician, wear glasses)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(musician, wear glasses)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(programmer, need glasses)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(programmer, need glasses)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(programmer, need glasses)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(programmer, need glasses)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(programmer, need glasses)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(programmer, wear glasses)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(programmer, need glasses)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(programmer, use glasses)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(programmer, need glasses)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(programmer, use glasses)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(programmer, need glasses)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(programmer, use glasses)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(programmer, need glasses)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(programmer, use glasses)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(programmer, need glasses)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(programmer, wear glasses)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(programmer, need glasses)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(programmer, do wear headphones)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(programmer, need glasses)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(programmer, do wear headphones)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(programmer, need glasses)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(programmer, wear glasses)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(programmer, need glasses)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(programmer, do wear headphones)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(programmer, need glasses)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(programmer, wear glasses)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(programmer, need glasses)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(programmer, do wear headphones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(programmer, need glasses)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(programmer, need glasses)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(programmer, need glasses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(programmer, need glasses)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(programmer, need glasses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(programmer, need glasses)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(musician, wear glasses)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(programmer, need glasses)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(musician, wear glasses)