programmer: need understand

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents musician
Weight: 0.62
, talent
Weight: 0.59
, expert
Weight: 0.58
, person
Weight: 0.57
Siblings developer
Weight: 0.57
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.34
, engineer
Weight: 0.34
, scientist
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
need understand 1.00
need know 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(programmer, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need understand)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(programmer, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(engineer, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(engineer, need understand)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(programmer, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(programmer, need understand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(programmer, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(programmer, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(programmer, need understand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(programmer, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(programmer, need understand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(programmer, need understand) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(engineer, need understand)