programmer: wear headphones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents musician
Weight: 0.62
, talent
Weight: 0.59
, expert
Weight: 0.58
, person
Weight: 0.57
Siblings developer
Weight: 0.57
, computer scientist
Weight: 0.34
, engineer
Weight: 0.34
, scientist
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear headphones 1.00
do wear headphones 0.99
wear headphones programming 0.93
wear glasses 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(musician, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(programmer, wear headphones)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(musician, wear glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(programmer, wear headphones)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(musician, wear headphones)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(musician, wear glasses)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(musician, wear headphones)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(musician, wear glasses)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(musician, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(programmer, wear headphones)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(musician, wear glasses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(programmer, wear headphones)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(programmer, wear headphones)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(programmer, do wear headphones)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(programmer, do wear headphones)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(programmer, do wear headphones)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(programmer, do wear headphones)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(programmer, wear headphones programming)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(programmer, wear headphones programming)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(programmer, wear headphones programming)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(programmer, wear glasses)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(programmer, wear glasses)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(programmer, wear headphones programming)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(programmer, wear glasses)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(programmer, wear glasses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(programmer, wear headphones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(programmer, wear headphones)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(musician, wear headphones)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(musician, wear glasses)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(musician, wear headphones)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(programmer, wear headphones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(musician, wear glasses)