programming language: be different from conventional language

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents language
Weight: 0.81
, syntax
Weight: 0.67
, computer science
Weight: 0.67
, topic
Weight: 0.64
Siblings source code
Weight: 0.69
, smalltalk
Weight: 0.68
, perl
Weight: 0.68
, lisp
Weight: 0.67
, basic
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from conventional language 1.00
be different from language 0.87
be different from english language 0.81
differ from human language 0.80
differ from language 0.79
be than other dynamic languages 0.79
be used differently in different cultures 0.79
be than faster other dynamic languages 0.79
be shown differently in other languages 0.78
be than other languages 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than other languages)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(lisp, be than other dynamic languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(lisp, be than other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(lisp, be than other languages)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(programming language, be different from conventional language)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(programming language, be different from language)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be different from language)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(programming language, differ from human language)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(programming language, differ from language)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(programming language, differ from human language)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(programming language, differ from language)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(programming language, be different from language)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(programming language, differ from human language)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(programming language, differ from language)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(programming language, be different from language)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(programming language, differ from language)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(programming language, differ from human language)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be different from conventional language)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(programming language, be different from conventional language)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(lisp, be than faster other dynamic languages)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lisp, be than other languages)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(lisp, be than other dynamic languages)