programming language: be written

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents language
Weight: 0.81
, syntax
Weight: 0.67
, computer science
Weight: 0.67
, topic
Weight: 0.64
Siblings source code
Weight: 0.69
, smalltalk
Weight: 0.68
, perl
Weight: 0.68
, lisp
Weight: 0.67
, basic
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be written 1.00
get written 0.96
be like written right-to-left 0.95
be written in english 0.84
be used writing 0.82
be like arabic written right-to-left 0.80
be important in writing 0.79
be important in piece writing 0.77
read left 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(syntax, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(programming language, be written)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(topic, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(programming language, be written)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(language, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(programming language, be written)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(language, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(programming language, be written)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(syntax, be important in piece writing)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(programming language, be written)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(language, be used writing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(language, be important in writing)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(topic, be important in writing)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(syntax, be important in writing)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(syntax, be important in piece writing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(language, be used writing)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(language, be important in writing)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(topic, be important in writing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be important in piece writing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(syntax, be important in writing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(syntax, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(programming language, be written)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(syntax, be important in piece writing)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(programming language, be written)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(topic, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(programming language, be written)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(language, be important in writing)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(programming language, be written)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(language, be used writing)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(programming language, be written)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(programming language, be written)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(programming language, get written)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(programming language, get written)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(programming language, get written)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(programming language, get written)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be written in english)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(programming language, be written in english)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(programming language, be written in english)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(programming language, be written in english)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be written)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(programming language, be written)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(language, be used writing)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(language, be important in writing)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(topic, be important in writing)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in writing)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in piece writing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(language, be used writing)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(language, be important in writing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(topic, be important in writing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in writing)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(programming language, be written)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(syntax, be important in piece writing)