programming language: is complicated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents language
Weight: 0.81
, syntax
Weight: 0.67
, computer science
Weight: 0.67
, topic
Weight: 0.64
Siblings source code
Weight: 0.69
, smalltalk
Weight: 0.68
, perl
Weight: 0.68
, lisp
Weight: 0.67
, basic
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
is complicated 1.00
is more complex 0.83
is confusing 0.83
is difficult 0.81
be like mandarin complicated 0.80
has state complex 0.80
seem difficult 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(computer science, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(programming language, is complicated)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(language, has state complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(programming language, is complicated)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(language, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(programming language, is complicated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(programming language, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(language, is difficult)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(programming language, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(language, has state complex)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(programming language, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(computer science, is difficult)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(programming language, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(language, is difficult)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(programming language, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(computer science, is difficult)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(programming language, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(language, has state complex)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(computer science, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(programming language, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(programming language, is complicated)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(language, is difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(programming language, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(programming language, is complicated)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(language, has state complex) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(programming language, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(programming language, is complicated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(programming language, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(programming language, is complicated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(programming language, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(programming language, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(programming language, is complicated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(programming language, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(programming language, is complicated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(programming language, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(language, is difficult)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(programming language, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(language, has state complex)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(programming language, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer science, is difficult)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(programming language, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(language, is difficult)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(programming language, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(language, has state complex)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(programming language, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(computer science, is difficult)