programming: be in other languages

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer science
Weight: 0.61
, operation
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.57
Siblings computer programming
Weight: 0.71
, tv show
Weight: 0.64
, comedy
Weight: 0.62
, broadcast
Weight: 0.55
, programming language
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in other languages 1.00
be different from conventional language 0.76
differ from language 0.76
differ from human language 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(programming, be in other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(programming language, be different from conventional language)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(programming, be in other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(programming language, differ from language)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(programming, be in other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(programming language, differ from human language)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(programming, be in other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(programming language, differ from language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(programming language, differ from language)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(programming, be in other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(programming language, be different from conventional language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(programming language, be different from conventional language)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(programming, be in other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(programming language, differ from human language) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(programming language, differ from human language)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(programming, be in other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(programming, be in other languages)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(programming, be in other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(programming, be in other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(programming, be in other languages)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(programming, be in other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(programming, be in other languages)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(programming, be in other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(programming language, differ from language)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(programming, be in other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(programming language, differ from human language)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(programming, be in other languages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(programming language, be different from conventional language)