programming: involve calculus

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer science
Weight: 0.61
, operation
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.57
Siblings computer programming
Weight: 0.71
, tv show
Weight: 0.64
, comedy
Weight: 0.62
, broadcast
Weight: 0.55
, programming language
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
involve calculus 1.00
require math 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(computer science, require math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(programming, involve calculus)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(programming, involve calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(computer science, require math)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(programming, involve calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(computer science, require math)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(computer science, require math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(programming, involve calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(programming, involve calculus)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(programming, involve calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(programming, involve calculus)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(programming, involve calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(programming, require math)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(programming, involve calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(programming, require math)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(programming, involve calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(programming, require math)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(programming, involve calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(programming, require math)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(programming, involve calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(programming, involve calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(programming, involve calculus)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(programming, involve calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(programming, involve calculus)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(programming, involve calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(computer science, require math)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(programming, involve calculus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(computer science, require math)