progressive: is direct cheap

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents label
Weight: 0.59
, publication
Weight: 0.57
, term
Weight: 0.57
, company
Weight: 0.56
Siblings liberal
Weight: 0.34
, vanguard
Weight: 0.32
, socialist
Weight: 0.32
, address label
Weight: 0.32
, radical
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is direct cheap 1.00
is direct 0.88
is cheap 0.88
is cheaper 0.78
be cheaper than geico 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(label, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(progressive, is direct cheap)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(progressive, is direct cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(label, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(progressive, is direct cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(label, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(progressive, is direct cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(vanguard, is cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(label, is cheaper) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(progressive, is direct cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(progressive, is direct cheap)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(progressive, is direct cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(vanguard, is cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(vanguard, is cheap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(progressive, is direct cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(progressive, is direct cheap)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(progressive, is direct cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(progressive, is cheap)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(progressive, is direct cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(progressive, is cheap)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(progressive, is direct cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(progressive, is cheap)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(progressive, is direct cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(progressive, is cheap)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(progressive, is direct cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(progressive, be cheaper than geico)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(progressive, is direct cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(progressive, be cheaper than geico)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(progressive, is direct cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(progressive, be cheaper than geico)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(progressive, is direct cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(progressive, be cheaper than geico)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(progressive, is direct cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(progressive, is direct cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(progressive, is direct cheap)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(progressive, is direct cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(progressive, is direct cheap)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(progressive, is direct cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(label, is cheaper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(progressive, is direct cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(vanguard, is cheap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(progressive, is direct cheap) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(label, is cheaper)