prohibition: was introduced in 1919

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents law
Weight: 0.66
, policy
Weight: 0.65
, rule
Weight: 0.65
, provision
Weight: 0.62
, movement
Weight: 0.60
Siblings common law
Weight: 0.36
, ordinance
Weight: 0.36
, amendment
Weight: 0.35
, legislation
Weight: 0.34
, mandate
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was introduced in 1919 1.00
was introduced in 1920s 1.00
was introduced 1.00
was enacted 0.80
was created 0.78
was developed 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(law, was created)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(law, was created)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(law, was created)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(amendment, was introduced)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(amendment, was created)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(law, was created)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(amendment, was introduced)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(amendment, was introduced)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(amendment, was created)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(amendment, was created)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(prohibition, was introduced)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was introduced)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(prohibition, was introduced in 1920s)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(prohibition, was introduced)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(prohibition, was enacted)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was introduced in 1920s)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(prohibition, was created)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(prohibition, was introduced in 1920s)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was introduced in 1920s)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was enacted)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(prohibition, was developed)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was created)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(prohibition, was developed)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was developed)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(prohibition, was enacted)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(prohibition, was created)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was developed)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was introduced)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was created)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was enacted)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(law, was created)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(amendment, was introduced)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(amendment, was created)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(prohibition, was introduced in 1919)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(law, was created)