project: be important in business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mission
Weight: 0.65
, upgrade
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, web site
Weight: 0.61
Siblings restoration
Weight: 0.69
, expansion
Weight: 0.69
, construction site
Weight: 0.68
, landscaping
Weight: 0.68
, construction worker
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in business 1.00
be important for business 0.99
be good for business 0.92
be important in development 0.80
be important to us 0.77
be important in planning 0.76
be needed for development of country 0.75
be like cassini mission important 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(facility, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(project, be important in business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mission, be like cassini mission important)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(project, be important in business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(mission, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(project, be important in business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(facility, be needed for development of country)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(project, be important in business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(facility, be important in business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(facility, be needed for development of country)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(mission, be important in planning)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(mission, be like cassini mission important)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(facility, be important in business)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(facility, be needed for development of country)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mission, be like cassini mission important)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mission, be important in planning)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be important for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(facility, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(project, be important in business)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(mission, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(project, be important in business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(mission, be like cassini mission important)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(project, be important in business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(facility, be needed for development of country)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(project, be important in business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(expansion, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(expansion, be important for business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(expansion, be good for business)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(expansion, be good for business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(project, be important in business)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(project, be important in development)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(project, be important to us)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(project, be important to us)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(project, be important to us)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(project, be important in development)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(project, be important to us)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(project, be important in development)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(project, be important in development)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(project, be important in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(project, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(facility, be important in business)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(facility, be needed for development of country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mission, be important in planning)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mission, be like cassini mission important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(expansion, be good for business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(expansion, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(facility, be important in business)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(facility, be needed for development of country)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mission, be important in planning)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(project, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(mission, be like cassini mission important)