project: challenge management

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mission
Weight: 0.65
, upgrade
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, web site
Weight: 0.61
Siblings restoration
Weight: 0.69
, expansion
Weight: 0.69
, construction site
Weight: 0.68
, landscaping
Weight: 0.68
, construction worker
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
challenge management 1.00
is management 0.83
fail project management 0.78
plan important in project management 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(project, challenge management)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(project, challenge management)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(project, challenge management)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(project, is management)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(project, challenge management)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(project, fail project management)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(project, challenge management)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(project, fail project management)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(project, challenge management)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(project, fail project management)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(project, challenge management)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(project, is management)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(project, challenge management)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(project, is management)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(project, challenge management)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(project, plan important in project management)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(project, challenge management)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(project, is management)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(project, challenge management)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(project, fail project management)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(project, challenge management)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(project, plan important in project management)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(project, challenge management)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(project, plan important in project management)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(project, challenge management)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(project, plan important in project management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(project, challenge management)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(project, challenge management)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(project, challenge management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(project, challenge management)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(project, challenge management)