project: fail mckinsey

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mission
Weight: 0.65
, upgrade
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, web site
Weight: 0.61
Siblings restoration
Weight: 0.69
, expansion
Weight: 0.69
, construction site
Weight: 0.68
, landscaping
Weight: 0.68
, construction worker
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
fail mckinsey 1.00
fail 1.00
is fail 0.99
fails 0.85
fail examples 0.83
fail due to lack 0.82
fail pdf 0.80
seemingly fail at random 0.79
fail statistics 0.79
fail due to lack of communication 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(restoration, fail)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(restoration, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(restoration, fail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(project, fail mckinsey)

Similarity expansion

0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(project, fail)
0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(project, fail)
0.85
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(project, fail)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(project, is fail)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(project, is fail)
0.84
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(project, is fail)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(project, fail)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(project, is fail)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(project, fails)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(project, fails)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(project, fails)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(project, fail examples)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(project, fail examples)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(project, fail examples)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(project, fail due to lack)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(project, fail due to lack)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(project, fail due to lack)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(project, fail pdf)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(project, fail pdf)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(project, fail pdf)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(project, fail statistics)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(project, fail statistics)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(project, fail statistics)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(project, fail due to lack of communication)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(project, fail due to lack of communication)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(project, fail due to lack of communication)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(project, fails)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(project, fail examples)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(project, fail pdf)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(project, fail statistics)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(project, fail due to lack)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(project, fail due to lack of communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(project, fail mckinsey)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(project, fail mckinsey)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(project, fail mckinsey) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(restoration, fail)