project: fail pdf

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mission
Weight: 0.65
, upgrade
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, web site
Weight: 0.61
Siblings restoration
Weight: 0.69
, expansion
Weight: 0.69
, construction site
Weight: 0.68
, landscaping
Weight: 0.68
, construction worker
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
fail pdf 1.00
fail project management pdf 0.87
fail mckinsey 0.80
fail 0.80
is fail 0.80
fail examples 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(restoration, fail)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(restoration, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(restoration, fail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(project, fail pdf)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(project, fail mckinsey)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(project, fail mckinsey)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(project, fail mckinsey)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(project, fail)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(project, fail)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(project, fail)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(project, is fail)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(project, is fail)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(project, is fail)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(project, fail project management pdf)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(project, fail project management pdf)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(project, fail project management pdf)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(project, fail examples)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(project, fail examples)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(project, fail examples)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(project, fail mckinsey)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(project, fail)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(project, is fail)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(project, fail examples)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(project, fail project management pdf)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(project, fail pdf)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(project, fail pdf)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(project, fail pdf) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(restoration, fail)