project: fail project management

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mission
Weight: 0.65
, upgrade
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, web site
Weight: 0.61
Siblings restoration
Weight: 0.69
, expansion
Weight: 0.69
, construction site
Weight: 0.68
, landscaping
Weight: 0.68
, construction worker
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
fail project management 1.00
fail project management pdf 0.91
plan important in project management 0.91
is management 0.83
be called projects 0.78
challenge management 0.78
is fail 0.77
be needed for development 0.77
fail mckinsey 0.77
fail 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(facility, be needed for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(project, fail project management)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(facility, be needed for development)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(facility, be needed for development)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(restoration, fail)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(facility, be needed for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(project, fail project management)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(restoration, fail) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(restoration, fail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(project, fail project management)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(project, fail project management pdf)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(project, fail project management pdf)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(project, fail project management pdf)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(project, is management)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(project, is fail)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(project, is fail)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(project, is fail)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(project, fail mckinsey)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(project, fail mckinsey)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(project, fail mckinsey)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(project, fail)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(project, fail)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(project, fail)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(project, be called projects)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(project, fail mckinsey)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(project, is fail)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(project, fail)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(project, fail project management pdf)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(project, challenge management)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(project, is management)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(project, plan important in project management)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(project, be called projects)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(project, challenge management)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(project, is management)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(project, be called projects)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(project, challenge management)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(project, plan important in project management)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(project, plan important in project management)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(project, plan important in project management)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(project, challenge management)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(project, be called projects)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(project, is management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(project, fail project management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(project, fail project management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(facility, be needed for development)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(restoration, fail)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(project, fail project management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(facility, be needed for development)