project: need planning

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mission
Weight: 0.65
, upgrade
Weight: 0.64
, facility
Weight: 0.63
, web site
Weight: 0.61
Siblings restoration
Weight: 0.69
, expansion
Weight: 0.69
, construction site
Weight: 0.68
, landscaping
Weight: 0.68
, construction worker
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
need planning 1.00
be important in planning 0.95
plan important in project management 0.79
need have 0.78
work on plan 0.78
work on framily plan 0.78
be needed for development 0.77
need work 0.77
be needed for development of country 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(mission, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(project, need planning)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(upgrade, work on framily plan)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(project, need planning)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(facility, be needed for development)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(project, need planning)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(facility, be needed for development of country)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(project, need planning)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(upgrade, work on plan)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(project, need planning)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(upgrade, work on plan)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(mission, be important in planning)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(facility, be needed for development of country)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(facility, be needed for development)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(upgrade, work on framily plan)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(facility, be needed for development of country)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mission, be important in planning)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(upgrade, work on framily plan)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(facility, be needed for development)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(upgrade, work on plan)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(expansion, need have)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(mission, be important in planning)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(project, need planning)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(upgrade, work on framily plan)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(project, need planning)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(facility, be needed for development)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(project, need planning)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(upgrade, work on plan)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(project, need planning)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(facility, be needed for development of country)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(project, need planning)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(construction worker, need work)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(construction worker, need work)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(expansion, need have)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(project, need planning)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(project, need have)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(project, plan important in project management)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(project, need have)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(project, need have)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(project, need have)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(project, plan important in project management)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(project, plan important in project management)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(project, plan important in project management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(project, need planning)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(project, need planning)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(upgrade, work on plan)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(facility, be needed for development)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(facility, be needed for development of country)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(upgrade, work on framily plan)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mission, be important in planning)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(construction worker, need work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(expansion, need have)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(upgrade, work on plan)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(facility, be needed for development)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(facility, be needed for development of country)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(upgrade, work on framily plan)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mission, be important in planning)