projector: be at meet

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.71
, item
Weight: 0.63
, electronic device
Weight: 0.60
, feature
Weight: 0.58
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, movie projector
Weight: 0.37
, digital camera
Weight: 0.36
, laptop
Weight: 0.36
, webcam
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at meet 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(projector, be at meet)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(laptop, be at meet)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(projector, be at meet)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(laptop, be at meet)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(laptop, be at meet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(projector, be at meet)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(projector, be at meet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(projector, be at meet)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(projector, be at meet)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(projector, be at meet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(projector, be at meet)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(projector, be at meet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(projector, be at meet)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(laptop, be at meet)